Two Unrelated Males who’s DNA is IDENTICAL to Mark’s

Yes! It’s true! Read on. 

The Y DNA is the paternal family DNA that is passed on from male to male on the father’s side and is identical to each male.

The State’s so-called DNA “expert”, Lorrain Heath, testified that the Y DNA found at some crime scene evidence is the Goudeau Y DNA. She combined her calculations of the Y with the more discriminating STR DNA to come up with the hyped, inflated, fantastical likelihood ration you’ve seen in the media, giving the general public the illusion that the DNA was entirely unique and that no one else in the world could share the same genetic markers. She said she got a hit on Mark’s Y DNA in the very small Y DNA database in 2006.

Well, now that the Y DNA database, over the years, has increased in size as other men’s Y DNA is added, there are now TWO MORE Y DNA profiles in this database that are IDENTICAL TO THE GOUDEAUS. And these two identical Y profiles are of UNRELATED MALES OF DIFFERENT RACES - one Black, the other White.  Although Heath didn't want to, she was forced to admit on the stand that there are currently two known unrelated males with the same Y DNA as Mark, snapping at Mark's attorney Rod Carter saying "I already told you that when we talked."

There are currently 1,200 Y DNA profiles in this database and as it continues to increase there will likely be more IDENTICAL UNRELATED Y DNA profiles in this database. Can you imagine how many other unrelated males that share the same Y that will never even be in the database?

The more we learn about the DNA in this case, the more we see what crap it is. Did I mention that shortly after Lorrain Heath contacted PPD with misinformation on the DNA resulting in Mark’s arrest, that she left the country?

Witness Pete Ochoa Gets Caught Lying On Stand

Pete Ochoa – Ritzz Catering (Report from 2010 trial)

I do not know or understand why people like Pete Ochoa willfully boldface lie on the stand under oath. Pete took the stand this week as a witness in the Tina Washington homicide. He testified that he recognized Mark as the person standing over Tina’s body. That he could tell by Mark’s eyes and the bone structure in his forehead that it was the same man.

Now here’s what Pete really told police. From the police report, and I quote : “Because the suspect had the hood placed over his head, Mr. Ochoa did not see the suspect’s face, so he did not know what race the suspect was.”

And  by a second detective who also interviewed Pete, again from the police report “The hood to the sweatshirt was over the suspect’s head, so Ochoa never saw the suspect’s face.”

What???? Under cross examination and confronted with his own words from the police report, Ochoa admitted on the stand that he did not get a look at the suspect. Pete had told two different detectives he could not see the suspect’s face.

In the police report Ochoa had also described the suspect as 5’7’ 140 lbs. Mark is nowhere near that height or weight.

What is this phenomenon that makes less than ordinary folks lie on the stand? Why do they think they’re going to outwit an experienced trial attorney? Was he raised by bad people? Innately a liar? Just born that way? Whatever his motive to lie, Pete is an idiot and hopefully he learned a very public lesson.

Defense Attorneys Rod Carter and Randall Craig Bill Padding?

We should have listened to many of you who felt Mark’s attorneys, Rod Carter and Randall Craig, did not have Mark’s best interest in mind.  I was even recently told by an attorney that the rumors are that they padded their invoices. In other words, billed the County for work on Mark’s case that was never performed.  I can tell you that jail visits that were reported and billed by Randy were false, that Mark did not see Randy on at least 11 visits Randy charged the County.

Below is a link to a July Phoenix New Times article by Paul Ruben on two Maricopa County court appointed attorneys who are caught fleecing the system and not providing services they billed for.  First mentioned, Nathaniel Carr, who attended ASU with and now offices with Rod Carter.  The other man in the article caught padding his billing is Steve Johnson. Steve Johnson was also Mark’s mitigation attorney.  I guess this explains why none of the nearly 60 names of friends and family provided to Steve for the mitigation hearings, were never contacted.  

I also guess this is why Mark spent 5 years in jail with rarely a visit from Randy or Rod or Steve. That calls Mark made to each of them, resulted in Mark being placed on hold for 20-30 minutes until Mark would finally hang up; billing opportunities for the guys since the County wouldn’t have known there was never a conversation, just Mark sitting on hold. I guess this is why not a single alibi witness for Mark was researched, looked up or interviewed by Rod or Randy.  I guess this is why the court appointed investigator for Mark’s case, was shunned by both Rod and Randy, cast aside and not utilized. I guess this is why Rod and Randy waited nearly a year to try to access Mark’s cell tower location records; this only after Mark and I repeatedly badgered them to submit the subpoena.  We could go on and on.

No wonder Rod and Randy rested without giving Mark a defense. How could they have provided a defense when they did absolutely nothing for Mark?  Nothing. I doubt they even read the police reports.

Mark spent 5 years in jail - so their billing opportunities could be dragged on and on.  They both made nearly a million dollars off of Mark’s back.  

Here’s the article below it states Nathaniel Carr was the highest paid court appointed attorney in Maricopa County, and right behind him in 2^nd and 3^rd place – Rod Carter and Randall Craig, Mark’s attorneys. Click here are copy and paste the link below into your browser -

http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/2012-07-19/news/death-penalty-lawyers-make-killing-off-maricopa-taxpayers/

Mark's Recorded Phone and Jail Conversations - Over 1800!

Five years of recorded daily phone calls and recorded jail visit conversations that occurred 3 times a week, all recorded.  Five years worth of recorded conversations.  That would be over 1800 recorded conversations! If Mark were guilty of any of the Baseline crimes, surely he would have said something, sometime incriminating if he had any involvement.  Humans can’t help but talk. It’s how we’re wired.  But Mark, since he did not commit any of these crimes; therefore no knowledge of these crimes, what incriminating thing could he say?  The answer, of course, is nothing!  Which is why not a single conversation was used by the State at trial.  Not one.

An Open Letter to DPS DNA Analyst, Lorraine Heath

There’s a new sheriff in town and it’s not Judge Klein. This is a whole new round with a respected judge that will not be led by the nose by the prosecutors. Judge Granville is by the book and has little patience for prosecutor Ms. Cohen and her antics.

As for your 2007 DNA testimony, there are many more people who now have their eyes and ears to this case. In fact, Chromosomal Labs observed your testimony in the 2007 trial and, as a result, approached Mark’s defense team to provide their lab and services for FREE. Yes, for FREE.

You might ask, what compelled Chromosomal to do this with such an enormous, high profile case? You see, ordinary citizens do not understand the complex nature of the DNA and they accepted your testimony as the gold standard, only because they didn’t understand. But those in the DNA industry roll their eyes at you and your questionable practices. They do not hold you in high regard. In fact, quite the contrary.  And there are some in the DNA industry who will not stand by while you railroad an innocent man simply for monetary gain and status.

Maybe it was your limited DNA experience that made you cocky. Your newness. Or maybe it was just for pure gain, but whatever your motives, there are qualified scientists and experts who know how far out of line you are.

This is a different courtroom, with different attorneys and experts, and the game has changed.

Members of Task Team Call Mark a N-R!

Lead investigators in Baseline task team (Alex Femenia et al) call Mark a N-R  when exonerating evidence is provided. See memo from the Phoenix Law Enforcement Association.

Terry Wayne Smith Cover Up

For those of you who don’t know about the cover up of Baseline Killer suspect, Terry Wayne Smith, here’s the Reader’s Digest version to get you up to speed.

Prior to Mark’s arrest September 6, 2006, Phoenix police officer Rusty Stuart was nearing the completion of a long, intensive investigation of Terry Wayne Smith. Based on TWS’s sociopathic behavior, connection to every single Baseline crime scene, bloody clothing, TWS family members calling TWS the Baseline Killer, and other factors, Rusty is convinced TWS has something to do with the crimes. He compiles his investigation and produces the entire report (nearly 200 pages) to the lead dics on the Baseline task force, Alex Femenia. Rusty makes several attempts to get Femenia to further investigage TWS but is dismissed. At one request, Femenia become very confrontational. Rusty is appalled at lead dic Alex Femenia’s “dereliction of duty.”

In 2008, Rusty, with four other PPD cops and Phoenix Law Enforcement Association members then take the report to the County Attorney’s office and present it to Andrew Thomas’s right hand man, Keith Manning. Manning and Thomas continue to hide the evidence and it is never produced to Mark’s defense team. 

Until that is underground forces surface the report. When Randy Craig, one of Mark’s attorney’s, starts shaking trees and making calls to find this report, Susanne Cohen, County prosecutor, coughs it up. Yes, the prosecutors knew of this report since 2006. The grand jury which indicted Mark never heard of Terry Wayne Smith. Susanne Cohen and Bill Clayton allowed Mark to go to trial while they hid this evidence.

Well now the cat is out of the bag and only because of good cops, Rusty Stuart, and other individuals the TWS report is now in the hands of the defense team. Had covert sources not brought this information to us, prosecutor Cohen, lead dics Alex Femenia, Mike Mieslish, Mike Polombo, Andrew Thomas, mayor Phil Gordon would still have had it under the rug. The TWS report was hidden for years.

When Rusty Stuart took the TWS information to Alex Femenia, Alex said this about Mark “Why would you want to give this NIGGER an alibi?” Rust is also concerned, and rightly so, about evidence being planted. You can read more on PLEA’s site - http://bitsy.me/ty. 

Flash to August 18, 2010: Rusty Stuart, now under protection of an attorney because of retaliation from PPD, has new TWS evidence and composes a letter to interim County Attorney, Richard Romley. You can read Rusty’s letter here – http://bitsy.me/tx. 

Even more shocking, androgynous prosecutors Susanne Cohen and Patty Stevens, filed a motion to try to keep the Smith issue out of trial. (Yes, first they conceal this evidence, then once found out try to prevent it from being used in court.)  Well they lost and it is likely Smith will be on the stand, among other people that support the actual facts.

Suspect Composites

The Baseline composite most of us are familiar with was the one on the billboards across Phoenix in 2006 and months after Mark's arrest.   What most people don’t know is there was another well hidden composite that was used during the 2007 trial.  Here they are side-by-side, remarkably different.  

That is unless you’re Alex Femenia.  If you're Alex, then all "niggers" (his term, not mine) look the same.  We recently came across another composite by Alex "Why Would You Give That Nigger An Alibi" Femenia, and here it is below.   We learned that Femenia put this together based on video of the suspect.  Femenia says it is a mirror image of Mark. 

More powerful, hard hitting evidence by Femenia, case manager of the Baseline task team

Trial To Begin June 6, 2011

The day has come and tomorrow is opening arguments. We are both nervous about trial and going in front of a jury of Mark’s “peers”, yet happy to finally have the opportunity to have the truth come out in a court of law.

Some of the recent developments include:

**Phoenix Police Fallen Regime --The very regime that the Baseline taskforce operated under is falling apart. County Attorney Andrew Thomas has been investigated (not on this case) and will no doubt lose his license to practice law due to corruption and abuse of power. (Thomas withheld the Terry Wayne Smith 160+ page report from Mark’s defense team.) Also double dipping Police Chief Jack “I Am Not Stepping Down” Harris has resigned after a fraud investigation by the Office of Inspector General. I am told Harris was the ringleader of the burglary of our home last summer in a desperate attempt to find any information that would help their case against Mark. Explains why two computers and a cell phone were taken, nothing else. Only items with “data.”

**Detective Dave Barnes, who was one of the detectives on the Baseline Investigation, will be a witness for us, not the State. As a result, not only has Barnes has been harassed by Phoenix police brass and placed on administrative leave, he also finds himself charged in other matters - all a direct result of this case. Judge Granville asked the prosecutors to give Barnes immunity at the trial, but before he could even finish his question, prosecutor Susanne Cohen’s response was “No!”  (Dave Barnes has information on the Terry Wayne Smith cover up, the disappearance of Mark’s cell tower location records, and searches of our home.)

**Not only did Phoenix Police, County Attorney Andrew Thomas, prosecutors, William Clayton, Suzanne Cohen and Patty Stevens, knowingly withhold the 160+ page report on Baseline suspect Terry Wayne Smith, they had the nerve to file a motion to try to prevent that evidence from being used at trial. Prosecutors lost that motion and not only will Rusty Stuart take the stand, the officer who wrote the report and took it numerous times to the Baseline task team, only to be told to go away, but Terry Wayne Smith will be on the stand as well.

**During jury selection any jurors who understood anything about DNA were removed by prosecutors. Speaks volumes that they wouldn’t want anyone to see what crap their so-called DNA evidence is.

These are only some of the things that have taken place. We hope to shed light on it all at trial.

Stay tuned.

The Problems with Arizona's DNA Database

FBI resists scrutiny of 'matches'

DNA: GENES AS EVIDENCE A crime lab's findings raise doubts about the reliability of genetic profiles. The bureau pushes back.

State crime lab analyst Kathryn Troyer was running tests on Arizona's DNA database when she stumbled across two felons with remarkably similar genetic profiles. 

The men matched at nine of the 13 locations on chromosomes, or loci, commonly used to distinguish people.

The FBI estimated the odds of unrelated people sharing those genetic markers to be as remote as 1 in 113 billion. But the mug shots of the two felons suggested that they were not related: One was black, the other white.  Read more . .

TARGETED - Mark Called Baseline Killer Before Any Investigation Whatsoever!

July 14, 2006, unemployed, mentally unstable, methamphetamine addict, Darlene Candice Fernandez, calls the Baseline task team reporting that she felt Mark was the Baseline Killer. When Darlene didn’t get a call back right away that same day, she escalates the situation and calls the Department of Corrections to try to get them to do something. DOC springs into Keystone Cop action and Todd Gerrish calls the Baseline task team suggesting that Mark resembled the composite and that they had been contacted by Darlene. Todd also misinforms the task team saying that Mark was a level two sex offender. Good job, duh, Todd. Utterly untrue.

Notonly did Darlene lie to police after she was beat up by her boyfriend, telling them Mark was her attacker, she also told police that Mark had raped her. Forensics didn’t support Darlene’s claim of a rape and without physical evidence of a rape, Mark was not charged with rape, never served time for rape, and was not placed on parole as a sexual predator.

The night Darlene was beat up by her boyfriend she was blood tests showed she was high on cocaine so she claimed Mark forced her to snort cocaine.  How do you force someone to snort cocaine?  Darlene has been arrested twice since that night. One of the arrests was a result of her buying meth from undercover cops in a west side bar parking lot - Wonder who forced her to do that. . . . . On another matter when Darlene was being subdued and escorted out of a bar by police due to the owner complaining about her obnoxious insane behavior, she yells on her way out that the owner is a child molester. Seems anyone who crosses this drug addled women is going to be accused of a sexual crime. Darlene then assaults the cop . . . .(look her up at http://www.maricopa.gov/ – case history - Darlene Candice Fernandez).

Darlene lied about the rape, she lied about her drug use, and she lied about who beat her up.

Back to July 14, 2006, Phoenix police reports state that armed with nothing more than an accusation from mentally unstable, meth addled Darlene Fernandez and Todd “duh” Gerrish’s blatantly wrong information (would have taken 5 minutes to research to get the facts!) members of the task team contacted Mark’s parole office that very day asking to violate Mark’s parole and arrest him, calling him “the Baseline Killer.” With no evidence! No evidence! Not a single thing other than a call to the tip line. NOTHING! The tip line received 100s and 100s if not 1000s of tips on other people, of which many, many weren’t even followed up.

Since Mark was in complete parole compliance and could not be arrested, he was then placed on surveillance for two weeks, before it was called off due to “no suspicious activity.”

The exhausted, over worked, task team lead by corrupt detective Alex Femenia (et al) jumped the gun, and rushed to charge Mark armed with tenuous DNA information only. Be mindful that Mark only matched 3 out of the 13 genetic DNA markers – not even sure how he was even been arrested on that.

Left with crappy, inconclusive so-called DNA evidence and nothing more, Alex Femenia was left to do damage control.  No evidence “found” until the FOURTH search of our small home.

Alex Femenia received an award for breaking the case. Curious what he received monetarily. And now a proud double dipper of your tax dollars by retiring from PPD and then being rehired at the County Attorneys office to work on Mark’s case full time, drawing both a full pension and salary.

Darlene Fernandez received the $100,000 reward. Wonder how much meth that will buy.