Two Unrelated Males who’s DNA is IDENTICAL to Mark’s

Yes! It’s true! Read on. 

The Y DNA is the paternal family DNA that is passed on from male to male on the father’s side and is identical to each male.

The State’s so-called DNA “expert”, Lorrain Heath, testified that the Y DNA found at some crime scene evidence is the Goudeau Y DNA. She combined her calculations of the Y with the more discriminating STR DNA to come up with the hyped, inflated, fantastical likelihood ration you’ve seen in the media, giving the general public the illusion that the DNA was entirely unique and that no one else in the world could share the same genetic markers. She said she got a hit on Mark’s Y DNA in the very small Y DNA database in 2006.

Well, now that the Y DNA database, over the years, has increased in size as other men’s Y DNA is added, there are now TWO MORE Y DNA profiles in this database that are IDENTICAL TO THE GOUDEAUS. And these two identical Y profiles are of UNRELATED MALES OF DIFFERENT RACES - one Black, the other White.  Although Heath didn't want to, she was forced to admit on the stand that there are currently two known unrelated males with the same Y DNA as Mark, snapping at Mark's attorney Rod Carter saying "I already told you that when we talked."

There are currently 1,200 Y DNA profiles in this database and as it continues to increase there will likely be more IDENTICAL UNRELATED Y DNA profiles in this database. Can you imagine how many other unrelated males that share the same Y that will never even be in the database?

The more we learn about the DNA in this case, the more we see what crap it is. Did I mention that shortly after Lorrain Heath contacted PPD with misinformation on the DNA resulting in Mark’s arrest, that she left the country?

EXONERATING DNA

Yes, it’s true. DNA evidence that exonerates Mark has been presented at trial – by the State no less. They just choose to ignore it. 

One of the “Baseline” homicides, June 30, 2006, was a poor woman murdered at night while she was vacuuming her car at a carwash not far from our home. The surveillance video shows a man approach and assault her. He then throws her into her own car’s backseat. He gets into the driver seat and drives away with her in the back.

The operative word here is VIDEO. The entire awful episode described above was recorded. The man got into her car, started it up, put it into drive, and drove away.

The State’s DNA witness testified that all DNA in the driving area –steering wheel, ignition, door panel, etc. - of the car EXCLUDES MARK! The DNA from the driving area is from an UNKNOWN MALE. NOT MARK!!!

How is it that Mark stands charged with any of these crimes if he is completely EXCLUDED? Furthermore, any DNA that the States claims they have as evidence are all PARTIAL PROFILES - NEVER a match to Mark. Not to mention, there are many, many pieces of other DNA evidence of which Mark is EXCLUDED.

Every single bit of DNA evidence that the State claines Mark cannot be excluded has been destroyed, or as the State calls it consumed, for testing. Not a single piece of raw DNA evidence for Mark to have analyzed by an independent lab in his defense.

The so-called Baseline crimes investigation is a tangled, bungled mess that will never be solved due to the State’s complete incompetence and far reaching corruption.

The Problems with Arizona's DNA Database

FBI resists scrutiny of 'matches'

DNA: GENES AS EVIDENCE A crime lab's findings raise doubts about the reliability of genetic profiles. The bureau pushes back.

State crime lab analyst Kathryn Troyer was running tests on Arizona's DNA database when she stumbled across two felons with remarkably similar genetic profiles. 

The men matched at nine of the 13 locations on chromosomes, or loci, commonly used to distinguish people.

The FBI estimated the odds of unrelated people sharing those genetic markers to be as remote as 1 in 113 billion. But the mug shots of the two felons suggested that they were not related: One was black, the other white.  Read more . .