So the message from the jury is . . .

It’s ok for police to search your small house repeatedly until they “find” something. If the police are that incompetent, why stop after the last search? Why not keep coming back?  Seriously, if they missed “evidence” the first 3 times, if they’re that bad why not keep coming back for more searches?  It’s because they completed their mission by planting the jewelry - the copy of the Walmart ring, void of any DNA – neither Mark’s nor the victim’s. How could Mark’s DNA be there if he never even touched it? As well as the victim. How could her DNA be on a ring that was merely reproduced, never touching her fingers?  

It’s ok for DNA evidence to change from dry to wet after it’s been dried and dry packaged in a paper envelope and entered into evidence as such – as testified to by both the autopsy doctor and the case manager. But when DPS DNA tech, Lorrain Heath gets it, it’s wet, in a baggie and glass tube. The only swabs in this case (Nunez) that a partial DNA profile is found. In other words, it’s ok for the State to switch and plant evidence.  

It’s ok when the suspect is videotaped by surveillance cameras assaulting a victim, getting in and driving her car away, yet the DNA on the ignition switch and steering wheel and the rest of the driving area EXCLUDES Mark. The jury chose to ignore this exonerating evidence.  

It's ok that lead dic Alex Femenia and his crew called Mark the Baseline Killer before any so-called DNA evidence, or evidence of any kind.  That it's ok to target innocent people and then serve them on a silver platter.

Although the jury may not have had the entire picture since Mark’s attorneys didn’t present a defense case –, they made the conscious decisions to ignore straightforward testimony of police misconduct and planting of evidence, and targeting Mark before any shred of so-called evidence.