Andrew Thomas' Logic "Absurd,"

County Craziness

 

Love how the regime that the Baseline investigation operated under has disintegrated as a result of it's on unlawfulness. This regime of County Attorney Andrew Thomas and Chief of Police Jack Harris have left office in the disgrace of corruption, abuse of power, and fraud. 

 

One day the fact that Harris had his goons burglarize my home in a desperate attempt to gather information, will come to light.

 

One day Thomas will actually be held accountable for hiding the extensive police investigative report of  violent and deviant viable Baseline suspect, Terry Wayne Smith. 

 

In the meantime, I'm left to enjoy articles like this one.

 

Andrew Thomas' Logic "Absurd," Says State Bar Counsel in Final Closing Argument; Disbarment Recommended -- Again -- for Former Prosecutors Thomas and Lisa Aubuchon

And here's a tidbit: I am told by sources that criminal charges are pending for Thomas (and others). Unfortunately, just not related to this unlawful behavior against Mark.

Baseline Killer investigation upcoming documentary preview

Click here to watch the video

The "N" Word

Benny Pina was another Phoenix Police dic that worked on the Baseline task force. Another reminder from someone who “was part of PLEA” (Phoenix Law Enforcement Association) reminds us again of Lt Pina and Sgt Mike Polombo calling my husband the “n” word.   

The following is from the www.badphoenixcops.com blog.

http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4364432255934734176&postID=1449208639756047674

"I was part of PLEA years ago when specific allegations were made against Pina and Polombo using the "n" word in a derogatory way toward K. Robinson and Mark Goudeau, along with using derogatory terms about Klima and his religion. Both denied the allegations and the case was closed. Seems Pina has not changed one bit. Lets hope he finally gets held accountable this time. Everyone knows Pina is a piece of shit since he became a LT and CMDR. He was actually decent when he was a Sgt. Polombo is just a bottom feeder and we all will be there karma catches up with him one day. BPC, I know of at least one actual photo of his whore wife Heather giving a BJ to an officer in uniform and it is rumored there is about 3 others. What a prize it would be to get your hands on one of those photos!"

Dog's Vomit

The 2007 trial of which Mark was convicted of raping Alejandra and Lorena Lara, was presided over by Judge Andrew G. Klein.       

Judge Klein recused himself from presiding over any other of Mark’s upcoming trials because Klein felt he could not do so impartially or without prejudice. Klein also made awful remarks about Mark off the record, I am told. Clearly this man needed to recuse himself, and thankfully he had the intelligence to do so. 

However, the appeal for the 2007 conviction recently went right in front of this very same man, judge Klein. The same man who recused himself because he could not make decisions in any further proceedings in Mark’s case without bias and his own personal feelings.

So it was no surprise that Mark’s appeal, whom Klein already admitted he could not deal fairly with, was denied. An appeal that introduced new evidence – the cover up of the extensive investigation of  Terry Wayne Smith by Officer Rusty Stuart.  Regardless that the prosecutors Susanne Cohen, William Clayton, Patty Stevens, and task team dics Alex Femenia, Mike Polombo, Mike Mieslish and others hid this report isn’t relevant for purposes of the appeal.  New evidence is new evidence, regardless of how it was found and cases are overthrown and new trials are ordered when there is new evidence this substantial.  

But like a dog returning to its vomit, Mark’s appeal went right back to the very judge who already admitted that his own personal feelings prevented him from being fair in regards to Mark.   

Scarey thing this thing they call our justice system. Seems more like the good ole boy system. 

As a dog returns to its vomit, so a fool repeats his foolishness. Proverbs 26:11

Arizona - Worst State in Country for Making Mistakes in Death Penalty Cases

From the Northern Arizona Innocent Project

A 2001 report issued by Columbia University Law professor, James Liebman, indicated that Arizona is among the worst states in the country when it comes to making mistakes in death penalty cases (A Broken System: Error Rates in Capital Cases, 1973-1995). An urgent need exists for students and concerned community members to become involved in cases where innocent people have been unjustly incarcerated.  Read more. . .

Legal Separation

For the record, Mark and I agreed to a legal separation in an attempt to protect myself financially. I, along with Mark, am being sued by 3 families of victims. The legal separation in no way diminishes my support for Mark, an innocent man framed by Phoenix police who were under enormous pressure to make an arrest. I will remain a constant in Mark’s life as I have the last 5 years. Nothing changes. These are the families who are suing:

Alvin Hogue who’s wife was one of the two women murdered in their lunch truck on lower Buckeye. Facts: Interviews with construction workers said the two women were known to sell drugs out of the lunch wagon. Hogue also confided in his friend that his wife was selling drugs out of the lunch truck. Murdered over drugs? Also, a close friend of Hogue’s went to police telling them she thinks Hogue is responsible for his wife’s death and that he’s prone to violent fits of jealously and rage. (In fact, in one of his rages Hogue badly hurt one of his children, dislocating his son’s shoulder.) Hogue also told her he didn’t believe Mark was the Baseline Killer. So why is he suing? 

Kristin Gibbons, a prostitute who was murdered shortly after being beat up by two Mexican men. Prosecutors lied to the grand jury and said it was two Black men, since Mark is Black. Police reports show that interviews with her mother and a close friend who owned a taco shop that Kristin called “headquarters” also said it was Mexicans who had beat her up. Did these two Mexican men murder Gibbons? Living such a dangerous lifestyle, who knows who murdered this poor woman.

Sophia Nunez’s family. After Mark’s arrest, the Nunez family hired Pete, a psychic to find out who her real killer was as the Nunez family was not convinced it was Mark. Pete recorded the meeting with photographs, and it was clear in the pictures Sophia’s mom was very unhappy about the psychic meeting. When Pete revealed the name of Sophia’s real killer, her sisters’ suspicions proved true – it was a friend of the family. Also according to police reports, Sophia had also confided to a neighbor/friend that she was being stocked by an “unknown male.” Not Mark.

Shortly after telling her neighbor this, Sophia was murdered. I’d want to also mention that Sophia’s abuse boyfriend and father of her children, Gilbert Martinez, was the first suspect that the family talked with about police. Sophia had split with Gilbert for the final time, after years of abuse, and the family felt he could not deal with it. Gilbert failed a lie detector test. Gilbert should thank his lucky stars that late in the game police turned their focus to Mark, otherwise it would have been Gilbert charged and convicted of her murder.

Police Reports and Trial Testimony Prove DNA was Planted!

All the DNA in this investigation is Y DNA. (This is with exception to the Lara 2007 sexual assault trial, but that was a match of 3 out of 13 genetic markers; too low to even make an arrest.) Y DNA can only identify male family lineages, as testified to at trial. Also, as testified at trial, unrelated males share identical Y DNA profile (matches). So Y DNA cannot and does not point to a single person; therefore an arrest cannot be made.

The only case in this investigation that had the individual, discriminating STR DNA was in the Sophie Nunez homicide. Lorraine Heath, DPS DNA technician, testified that the partial STR DNA profile swabbed from Nunez’s breast was consistent to 9 of Mark’s genetic markers.

Here’s where it gets interesting. Two State witnesses testified at trial that ALL swabs in the Nunez case were placed in a drying room, and then dry paper packaged, including the 2 breast swabs. Police reports also state these same facts. 

Yet, when Heath took the stand, she testified that the 2 breast swabs were wet and sealed in a baggie in a glass tube. And these are the swabs that have the partial STR profile that match Mark at 9 loci (genetic markers).

I’ll now ask the obvious: How did these 2 swabs which were entered into evidence dry, change to wet? Packaged completely differently?

Whoever switched these swabs knew nothing about the DNA drying process, but did know that Nunez was submerged in a tub of water, so they planted wet swabs.

Tampered, switched, changed, whatever you want to call it, it is yet another indicative statement how this investigation in its entirety was done – with collusion and intimidation and corruption and racism.